Hadi Rostami; farhad mirzaei
Abstract
There are no fixed criteria for sentencing across all penal justice systems and they often vary as a result of social circumstances. Apart from having been rooted in its philosophical and ideological fundaments, punishment is a social event which is directly affected by industrial development and civilization ...
Read More
There are no fixed criteria for sentencing across all penal justice systems and they often vary as a result of social circumstances. Apart from having been rooted in its philosophical and ideological fundaments, punishment is a social event which is directly affected by industrial development and civilization progress. An offense is a personal choice since it is normally a consequence of an individual’s reason whereas punishment is an act of collective wisdom following common reasoning of a group. Even though violence is still prevalent in crime in all societies, civilized humans are not allowed to openly apply violence in punishment and no one simply accepts to use it as harsh punishment. At present, employment of violence by the government as part of punishment is subject to such a lot of restrictions that governments do not possess their former freedom in punishment anymore. Demonstration of severity of punishment has gradually disappeared and now punishment systems have been transformed and rationalized due to modern civilization. Along with modernity, apparent demonstration of violence in the form of death carnivals has left the social scene and logic and modern rationality have set in throughout all aspects of human life, especially social reaction to crime.
Hadi Rostami
Abstract
Obtaining of causation between act and result, in particular in case of a multiplicity of causes especially in the premise of multiplicity of factors and instruments is one of the most difficult issues in the criminal law and civil responsibility. When multiple people at different times (longitudinal) ...
Read More
Obtaining of causation between act and result, in particular in case of a multiplicity of causes especially in the premise of multiplicity of factors and instruments is one of the most difficult issues in the criminal law and civil responsibility. When multiple people at different times (longitudinal) are involved in the felony and a relatively long period of time is created between the interveners' behavior and the result of it (such as murder), this subject appears as a serious problem and sometimes as an unsolvable dilemma. Penal code act of 1392 has also mostly attempted to provide solutions under certain conditions instead of offering a clear criterion. Accordingly, in the case of intervention of direct multiple individuals in the same time, the result is put into account all factors and otherwise, may be responsible for recent perpetrator or first or both. Also, in case of more than indirectly involved multiple factors simultaneously all equally are responsible and otherwise, Otherwise, on the condition that felony is unintentional, the person who is responsible to intervene earlier. In addition, the direct and indirect involvement in the community, without being presented certain criteria, factors that damage or crime attributed to him, is responsible.
